NMPF President Tells Senate Panel about Possibilities, Pitfalls with Past Free Trade Agreements

WASHINGTON, DC – Even after free trade agreements are negotiated by the U.S. government, the value of the pacts depends greatly on the ability of the United States to make other countries live up to their commitments when the agreements are enforced, according to the National Milk Producers Federation, whose president testified today at a Senate hearing on the lessons from how past trade agreements have been implemented.

Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of NMPF, told members of the Senate Finance committee Thursday that trade has become critically important to America’s dairy sector, thanks to the Uruguay Round and numerous new U.S. free trade agreements since 1994.  Even as dairy exports have grown, assisted in sizable part by the arduous, careful negotiations of the treaties, in some cases we have “to work almost as hard to ensure that the market access terms of the agreements are not subsequently undermined,” Mulhern said.

Mulhern cited as an example of this dynamic the ongoing challenge to maintain access to the Canadian dairy market through the North American Free Trade Agreement and the Uruguay Round. Canada continues to erect impediments to block dairy imports from the U.S., he said. One of its latest targets “is U.S. exports of ultra-filtered milk. Canada has been considering expanding its restrictions on the use of certain dairy inputs in cheese-making to hinder imports. If Canada is allowed to continue with this pattern of eroding existing U.S. dairy access, it is difficult to see how new trade commitments with them will benefit our dairy industry,” Mulhern said.

Similar post-FTA issues arose with South Korea, but prompt and proactive U.S. government actions were successful in “ensuring that Korean officials worked with our government to resolve most of them,” he said.

Mulhern said that the best window of opportunity for influencing how countries will implement their FTA obligations “is during the period prior to congressional approval of an agreement.  Action during this window not only ensures that Congress has a clear understanding of how the agreement is intended to work in practice, but it utilizes the strongest point of leverage the U.S. possesses: whether or not we will decide to put in place a strengthening of our trade ties with the FTA partner.”

“This becomes especially important now that the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations have concluded, and consideration in Congress will at some point begin. It is also important given that our attention is now turning to intensifying the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations with the European Union.” He noted that a concrete approach to addressing the serious regulatory and technical barriers to trade with Europe has yet to develop in the TTIP talks.

“At this stage, given our past experiences, we do not believe TTIP is currently on the right track” for a successful and truly market-opening conclusion, Mulhern said. In addition to the dairy regulatory challenges, another very troubling issue in those negotiations is the EU’s geographical indications strategy, where the EU is seeking to restrict the use of common food names just for European food producers, both in the U.S. and in other nations to which the EU exports food.

“It is essential that we protect our trade rights from the onslaught of EU efforts to bully our trading partners into blocking imports of products from countries that allow the use of product names the EU wishes to reserve for itself through overly broad GI restrictions. This market eroding pattern began in Korea and soon spread to our Latin American FTA partners before impacting others around the world as well,” he said.

The geographical indications text in the pending TransPacific Partnership “was conceived as a direct response to trade restrictions that were threatening to crop up in our FTA markets,” Mulhern said.  “But our experience tells us that we will have to work hard not only to enforce the letter of that agreement, but also to ensure that its intention to help promote robust competition is not undermined as a result of ongoing pressure from the EU.  With the right focus and strategic efforts, positive results in this area are achievable, as this week’s good news about a breakthrough on GI issues with Honduras helps to demonstrate.”

###

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the well-being of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. For more on NMPF’s activities, visit our website at www.nmpf.org.

Dairy Industry Commends U.S. Administration for Securing Clarity on U.S. Market Access Rights under Central American FTA

ARLINGTON, VA — The dairy industry today thanked the U.S. government for its extensive work aimed at securing clarifications regarding the right to use several generic cheese names in exports to Honduras while also establishing a better model for how Central American countries can more reliably provide such information in the future.

Honduras is an important trading partner in a growing region for U.S. dairy exports. It is a member of the U.S.-Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). U.S. dairy exports to CAFTA partners totaled $109 million last year, with Honduras ranking second in the FTA region.

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) and the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) said they appreciated the Administration’s diligent work with Honduras, which this week clarified the use of threatened cheese names including parmesan, provolone and brie. Although the results did not include assurance on the continued use of certain other common names currently protected in Honduras, it does provide important assurances on many common name products.

The threat stemmed from a free trade agreement between Honduras and the European Union, in which the EU secured provisions that threatened to restrict the use of numerous commonly used food names as a way to gain a trade advantage. After numerous discussions between the United States and Honduras, the country agreed, among other things, to clearly spell out on its official website the scope of protection of the names and to create a searchable database to identify geographical indications, the official designations that protect the unique nature of specialized foods. The database will also identify which elements of those terms are deemed to be generic. In addition, Honduras committed to other steps such as providing similar clarifications for future GI applications.

“The dairy industry has worked closely with the Administration for several years to mitigate potential damage to our CAFTA market access opportunities arising from the Central America – EU FTA,” said NMPF President and CEO Jim Mulhern. “USTR’s work with Honduras was particularly important, since a previous lack of easily accessible information in Honduras hurt our own efforts to determine our ability to keep using common cheese names in exports to that country.”

Tom Suber, president of USDEC, also praised this latest accomplishment, while stressing that this was one victory in a continuing battle with Europe over geographical indications.

“Essentially, through geographical indications provisions in its FTAs, Europe wants to monopolize the use of food names that have long been in the public domain,” Suber said. “We encourage USTR keep working in additional markets – both in Central America and around the globe – to preserve our ability to use these common cheese names, particularly in countries with which we have our own free trade agreements.”

###

The U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) is a non-profit, independent membership organization that represents the global trade interests of U.S. dairy producers, proprietary processors and cooperatives, ingredient suppliers and export traders. Its mission is to enhance U.S. global competitiveness and assist the U.S. industry to increase its global dairy ingredient sales and exports of U.S. dairy products. USDEC accomplishes this through programs in market development that build global demand for U.S. dairy products, resolve market access barriers and advance industry trade policy goals. USDEC is supported by staff across the United States and overseas in Mexico, South America, Asia, Middle East and Europe.

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), based in Arlington, Va., develops and carries out policies that advance the well-being of U.S. dairy producers and the cooperatives they collectively own. The members of NMPF’s 30 cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S, milk supply, making NMPF the voice of nearly 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. For more on NMPF’s activities, visit www.nmpf.org.

The U.S. Dairy Export Council prohibits discrimination on the basis of age, disability, national origin, race, color, religion, creed, gender, sexual orientation, political beliefs, marital status, military status, and arrest or conviction record.

NMPF Supports New Senate Food Labeling Bill Approved Today by Agriculture Committee

ARLINGTON, VA – The National Milk Producers Federation today urged the full Senate to act quickly on legislation that would establish national regulations to bring consistency and transparency to the labeling of ingredients and processes used in the food supply.

The Senate Agriculture Committee today approved, by a 14-6 vote, a bill introduced last week by its Chairman, Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS), that would create a common-sense, national food labeling standard offering consumers information about products that contain ingredients such as Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).   The legislation would preempt state laws that create labeling mandates for foods with ingredients that have been genetically modified.

Food labeling “is an area where we need a clear federal standard, not a piecemeal approach across the 50 states,” said Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of NMPF. “We’ve learned from experience in the dairy sector that we need a strong federal policy governing labeling claims. Otherwise, we’ll end up with an unworkable series of competing and confusing state policies.”

NMPF urged the Senate to expedite passage of Roberts’s measure, in order to prevent confusing marketing environment in the food industry this summer, when Vermont’s new law, requiring labeling of foods containing GMOs, goes into effect on July 1st.  The Senate’s approach “will provide information that shoppers want, without requiring that stigmatizing label claims be mandated at the state or federal level,” Mulhern said. “Any requirement, even at the state level, to use labels to call out GMO ingredients is a de facto scarlet letter being forced on many foods, without warrant.  Mandatory GMO labels play into the fear-based marketing we see too frequently in the food industry.”

NMPF and its 31 cooperative members co-signed a letter last Tuesday with more than 600 other farm and food groups urging action on Sen. Roberts’ bill by the Senate.  The House of Representatives already passed a version of a national food labeling bill last July.

Multiple studies have shown that the associated costs with Vermont’s GMO-labeling law, and a subsequent patchwork of similar state laws, will cost American families hundreds of dollars more in groceries each year – with low-income Americans being hit the hardest.

The Roberts bill “will gives consumers the information they want in a consistent and factual way,” said Mulhern. “It also reaffirms the authority of federal regulators over food safety and labeling, and prevents the creeping development of dozens of different state food labeling laws.”

Genetically modified food ingredients have been proven safe by nearly 2,000 studies from the leading scientific bodies worldwide. Included are the World Health Organization and the American Medical Association. Up to 80 percent of the food available in the United States contains genetically modified ingredients.

###

The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the well-being of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. For more on NMPF’s activities, visit our website at www.nmpf.org.

February 2016 NMPF-DMI Dairy Market Report Now Available

U.S. milk production continues to grow at an annual rate of less than 1 percent. Despite this, milk prices are weakening going into the first half of 2016. Weakness in world markets is transmitting low prices into the domestic nonfat dry milk and dry whey markets, while exports of butter and cheese remain well below levels of last year. The bimonthly MPP margin for November-December was $9.56, but most forecasts project that it will fall to between $7 and $8 during the next few months.

Find the Dairy Market Report on our website.

NMPF Files Opposition Letters to USDA on Organic FMMO Proposal

On September 29, 2015 USDA received a hearing request from the Organic Trade Association seeking a hearing to amend all Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO) to include alternative producer-settlement fund payments for USDA certified organic milk. OTA’s proposal, if adopted, would certainly eliminate producer settlement fund payment obligations paid by organic handlers into the FMMO revenue sharing pools. As a result, the regulated minimum milk value provided by FMMOs would be reduced by tens of millions of dollars each year. In addition, this proposal would set a bad precedent as it would erode participation and undermine the stability of the time honored FMMO system.

NMPF filed two letters to USDA in oppostion to this hearing request. These letters are linked below:

MILC Would Not Have Triggered in 2015

The rapid decline in U.S. milk prices experienced during 2015 combined with the lack of widespread program payments from the new Dairy Margin Protection Program (MPP) has perpetuated a sense of “buyer’s remorse” with respect to MPP. Many farmers may be openly curious if the old Milk Income Loss Contract (MILC) payment program would have offered better safety net protection against recent milk price declines.

When the initial sign-up period for MPP coverage in 2015 got underway in September of 2014, farmers were in the midst of record-high milk prices. The U.S. all-milk price averaged $24 per hundredweight for the year, and in some parts of the country fluid milk prices approached $30 per hundredweight. Despite economic evidence of price cycles in dairy markets, many U.S. producers responded to the market price signals of 2014 by adding cows and increasing milk production.

Now, more than halfway through 2015, the U.S. is fast approaching another record year of milk production. Meanwhile, reduced demand in the wake of global supply increases have combined to put downward pressure on global dairy market prices. U.S. milk prices have fallen from their 2014 record highs but remain above milk prices received by farmers in Europe and New Zealand. Importantly, current U.S. milk prices would not havetriggered any payments under the old MILC program.

The MILC program, repealed in the 2014 Farm Bill, provided income support to dairy farmers based on the shortfall in milk prices below a feed-adjusted $16.94 per hundredweight trigger price. USDA milk and feed price data reveals that program payments under MILC would not have been triggered at any point during the first half of 2015. Through July of 2015 the Boston Class I milk price has averaged $19.59 per hundredweight while the feed-adjusted MILC trigger price would have averaged $17.98 per hundredweight. As a result, on average, milk prices would have needed to be $1.61 per hundredweight lower to have consistently triggered MILC in 2015. On a monthly basis, the closest MILC came to triggering a payment was in April of 2015 when the Boston Class I price was 64¢ per hundredweight above the feed-adjusted MILC trigger price. Put simply, MILC would not have triggered during the first half of 2015.

Going forward, August through October Boston Class I milk prices are known at $19.53, $19.59, and $19.09 per hundredweight, respectively. Late-September futures prices for milk and feed indicate that the likelihood of MILC triggering, had it not been terminated, remain at very low levels through the remainder of 2015.

In contrast, MPP, which replaced MILC in September 2014, immediately began making payments in 2015. While MPP remains a work in progress, MPP is functioning as intended and has been in payment status for all months during the first half of 2015. MPP is not a direct payment program, it is not designed to enhance income, and importantly it is not an investment product. Instead, MPP is an insurance-style safety net program designed to help dairy farms protect against catastrophic losses in farm income resulting from milk and feed price variability. Farmers pay premiums for coverage and in exchange receive risk management protection at levels they choose up to $8 per hundredweight. Protection above $8 per hundredweight is not provided by MPP. However, farmers can simultaneously use private risk management options such as futures or forward pricing programs to compliment MPP and potentially cover margins higher than $8 per hundredweight.

For the 2015 coverage year USDA Farm Service Agency data revealed that 55 percent of licensed dairy operations, representing approximately 80 percent of projected 2015 U.S. milk production, signed-up to participate in MPP. While few farmers elected the highest level of supplemental coverage, those that did are scheduled to receive more than $400,000 for the first half of 2015. Those who insured less, including those who paid $100 for basic $4 coverage, have not received any compensation because national average margins haven’t been at the catastrophically low levels experienced during 2009 or 2012. Instead, three consecutive big crop years in corn and soybeans have pushed feed prices to their lowest levels in four years and effectively offset recent milk price declines. The net effect of parallel declines in both national average milk and livestock feed prices has been that MPP margins remain near the five-year average level of $8 per hundredweight.

USDA’s MPP decision tool indicates that margins are improving, yet considerable risks remain for 2016. There are a number of factors to reflect on that could combine to pressure dairy markets going forward. First, feed prices are at multi-year lows and grain farmers may soon consider adjusting acreage in search of crops with higher per acre returns. If feed supplies tighten through fewer acres planted, or adverse weather reduces the crop size, feed prices would increase and margins would surely decline.

Second, for a number of years growth in domestic milk production has outpaced domestic consumption growth. With supplies increasing faster than domestic consumption, increased export opportunities helped to remove surplus product and support U.S. milk prices. However, current U.S. prices of cheese and butter remain above international price levels and a strong U.S. dollar makes our products less competitive overseas. The Russian embargo and slowing Chinese demand for dairy also hang over the market. The U.S. Dairy Export Council expects exports to struggle through mid-2016. With dwindling export opportunities milk prices could face pressure in 2016 as the U.S. amasses record inventories of cheese and powder. Bottom line, milk and feed price volatility is likely to persist. While risk in 2015 has been on the revenue side, going forward, risks will remain two-fold and justifies replacement of MILC with MPP.

USDA’s MPP decision tool includes a financial stress-test calculator. Using the stress-test feature dairy farmers may examine the extent to which MPP can assist in managing farm risk as it pertains to profit, liquidity, and solvency, given the uncertain milk and feed environment during the upcoming year. With so much uncertainty in 2016 now is not the year to walk away from MPP.

 

FARM and BQA Extend Collaborative Commitment on Animal Care Issues

(Washington, D.C. – February 16, 2016) – In order to strengthen the ongoing partnership between the dairy and beef segments of the cattle industry on animal care issues, the National Milk Producers Federation and the beef checkoff-funded Beef Quality Assurance program today announced they will jointly be offering more training opportunities for farmers and ranchers in 2016.

NMPF has been working for the past year on identifying areas where its Farmers Assuring Responsible Management (FARM) program can further coordinate with the Dairy Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) Program, managed by the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association on behalf of the Beef Checkoff. Both programs focus on educating cattle producers about the best practices in animal care, to assure consumers that their meat and milk comes from animals that receive optimal care throughout the animals’ lives.

At the Cattle Industry Convention last month, the BQA Advisory Board approved an addition to its program whereby any dairy producer evaluated using the FARM program’s upcoming version 3.0, due out in January 2017, will also receive their BQA certification. BQA will also be working with the FARM program in the coming years to create training opportunities for dairy producers to preserve the beef quality of their cows. These training sessions will focus on stockmanship, residue prevention, and transportation. Many of these training opportunities will be available at the state level, implemented by the BQA state coordinators.

“This partnership will maximize the value of the beef checkoff’s investment in animal care, which is an issue of greater importance today because of consumers’ interest in the source of their beef, and the treatment of cows,” said Dan Kniffen, Ph.D., vice chair of the BQA Advisory Board.

Emily Meredith, NMPF’s Vice President of Animal Care, and director of the FARM program, said that “education is the key to preventing health and wellness problems for cattle further down the road. This collaboration with BQA will extend the reach of the FARM program’s educational materials, and harness the expertise that BQA state network of educators can provide to dairy farmers.”

In addition to regional training sessions and additional educational materials, the FARM program and BQA will jointly produce online stockmanship training resources that will be made available to dairy farmers in 2016.

# # #

About NMPF
The National Milk Producers Federation, based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the wellbeing of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of more than 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. Visit www.nmpf.org for more information.

About the Beef Checkoff Program
The Beef Checkoff Program was established as part of the 1985 Farm Bill. The checkoff assesses $1 per head on the sale of live domestic and imported cattle, in addition to a comparable assessment on imported beef and beef products. States with qualifying state beef councils retain up to 50 cents on the dollar and forward the other 50 cents per head to the CBB, which administers the national checkoff program, subject to USDA approval.

About NCBA
The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA), based in Centennial, Colo., and a contractor to the Beef Checkoff Program, has represented America’s cattle producers since 1898. As the largest association of cattle producers, NCBA works to create new markets and increase demand for beef.

After wto realease of retaloation amount, dairy groups again

There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which don’t look even slightly believable. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn’t anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary, making this the first true generator on the Internet. It uses a dictionary of over 200 Latin words, combined with a handful of model sentence structures, to generate Lorem Ipsum which looks reasonable. The generated Lorem Ipsum is therefore always free from repetition, injected humour, or non-characteristic words etc.

Margin Protection Program Forecast

NMPF’s forecast for 2016 MPP margins – based on early February milk and feed futures prices – indicates that margins early in 2016 may dip below the $8 threshold in the spring before strengthening in the latter half of 2016. As evidenced by the wide confidence interval, a high degree of uncertainty remains in milk and new crop feed prices.

2016 NMPF Scholarship Program Still Welcoming Applications

The National Milk Producers Federation continues to accept applications for its National Dairy Leadership Scholarship Program for academic year 2016-2017. Applications must be received no later than Friday, April 8, 2016. 

Each year, NMPF awards scholarships to outstanding graduate students (enrolled in Master’s or Ph.D. programs) who are actively pursuing dairy-related fields of research that are of immediate interest to NMPF member cooperatives and the U.S. dairy industry at large. 

Graduate students pursuing research of direct benefit to milk marketing cooperatives and dairy producers are encouraged to submit an application. Applicants do not need to be members of NMPF to qualify.  The top scholarship applicant will be awarded the Hintz Memorial Scholarship, which was created in 2005 in honor of the late Cass-Clay Creamery Board Chairman Murray Hintz.

Recommended fields of study include, but are not limited to, Agriculture Communications and Journalism, Animal Health, Animal and/or Human Nutrition, Bovine Genetics, Dairy Products Processing, Dairy Science, Economics, Environmental Science, Food Science, Food Safety, Herd Management, and Marketing and Price Analysis. 

For an application or more information, please visit the NMPF website or call the NMPF office at 703-243-6111.