Author: dcadmin

House Members Join Senate in Condemning EU Tactic on Cheese Names

Posted on by dcadmin

A bipartisan group of more than 175 House members has joined a majority of the U.S. Senate in urging the Obama administration to fight back against European Union efforts to keep U.S. dairy companies from using common cheese names like parmesan and feta both in export markets and in the United States.

In a mid-May letter, the House members urged U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to use transatlantic trade talks to address a variety of export barriers hampering the U.S. dairy industry. Chief among them was the EU’s gratuitous use of “geographical indications” to limit the use of familiar food names in other countries. 
 
The letter followed similar correspondence sent in March by more than 50 senators.  
 
Two co-chairs of the Congressional Dairy Farmer Caucus, Reps. Reid Ribble (R-WI) and Peter Welch (D-VT), spearheaded the House letter, with help from NMPF, the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the International Dairy Foods Association. The letter pointed out that negotiations with the European Union over the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership are an opportunity to address protectionist measures that block U.S. dairy sales to 500 million consumers.
 
“The EU is taking a mechanism that was created to protect consumers against misleading information and instead using it to carve out exclusive market access for its own producers,” the letter said. “This type of barrier to trade and commerce defies the fundamental goals of a trade agreement, and we urge you to work aggressively against the EU’s efforts ….” 
 
NMPF also presented on the importance of the issues the House letter addresses – tariffs, common names and other nontariff barriers confronting U.S. dairy exports to the EU – to U.S. and EU negotiators during the May TTIP stakeholders forum in Arlington, Virginia.

Co-ops, Processors Demands Access to Japanese, Canadian Markets in Trade Deal

Posted on by dcadmin
If Japan and Canada renege on pledges to open their markets to U.S. dairy products, don’t count on our support for the Trans-Pacific trade pact. That’s the message nearly 40 cooperatives and dairy processing companies – all members of NMPF or the U.S. Dairy Export Council – sent to the Obama administration in early June. 
 
NMPF and USDEC initiated the united industry message to underscore the need for comprehensive access to Japanese and Canadian markets in any final Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement. The message – in the form of letters to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack – came on the heels of Japanese statements that it would not agree to abolish tariffs on key agricultural products, including dairy. The ambitious trade agreement has been under discussion for several years.
 
“Dairy industry support of the TPP is not unconditional,” said NMPF President and CEO Jim Mulhern. “If access to our products is not assured by Japan and Canada, we will find it difficult to support the final agreement. In addition, we could re-examine our support for fast-track TPP approval in Congress.”  
 
Tom Suber, President of USDEC, added: “…it is critical that Japanese and Canadian participation in TPP be meaningful and comprehensive across all dairy products. It is entirely unacceptable to have such sizable, sophisticated economies refusing to undertake the necessary openness that they agreed to upon entering TPP.”
 
In addition to urging U.S. negotiators to remain focused on opening up the Japanese and Canadian markets, the dairy organizations stressed the importance of addressing the lingering impacts of New Zealand government policies that have advantaged the country’s leading dairy firm at the expense of other dairy exporters. 
 

NMPF to EPA on Waters Regulation: ‘Clear as Muddy Water’

Posted on by dcadmin

Citing incomplete science and unclear terminology, NMPF has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to delay a decision on its controversial draft regulation expanding the waterways subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act.  

In a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, NMPF’s President and CEO Jim Mulhern said dairy farmers are committed to protecting U.S. waters both voluntarily and under the Clean Water Act. However, Mulhern said, “it is imperative that the EPA go about this effort in the right way, in light of the potential impact of this measure on dairy farmers. It would be a disservice to farmers to rush this proposal through the review process without sufficient scientific support or time to better understand the complexities of the issue.”

 
The regulation expands the waterways covered under the 1972 Clean Water Act to nearly all those connected to U.S. navigable waters. NMPF noted that EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have not completed the report providing the scientific underpinning for the regulation and that many of its key concepts – including ‘‘riparian area,’’ ‘‘floodplain,’’ ‘‘tributary,’’ and ‘‘significant nexus’ – are either undefined or subject to interpretation by government regulators. “These terms are as clear as muddy water, and, therefore, will create confusion for dairy producers,” NMPF said.  
 
It added: “Given the scope and complexities of the proposed rule and its supporting documents, NMPF requests an extension of the comment period, either to 90 days beyond the current deadline, or 90 days beyond EPA’s release of the final connectivity report” providing scientific basis for the regulation.” 
 

CWT Helps with another 14.2 Million Pounds of Dairy Exports

Posted on by dcadmin

Cooperatives Working Together helped member cooperatives sell another 14.2 million pounds of dairy products overseas in May. The voluntary, farmer-funded program will provide assistance on 53 overseas sales from seven different cooperatives: Dairy Farmers of America, Foremost Farms, Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Association, Michigan Milk Producers Association, Northwest Dairy Association (Darigold), Tillamook County Creamery Association and Upstate-O-AT-KA. The products included 7.1 million pounds of American-type cheese, 4.2 million pounds of butter, and 3 million pounds of whole milk powder. All will be delivered before the end of the year.

 
This brings the year-to-date total to over 111 million pounds of dairy product export sales assisted by CWT, the equivalent of 1.618 billion pounds of milk on a milkfat basis. 
 

New Faces of Farming to be Selected

Posted on by dcadmin

The U.S. Farmers & Ranchers Alliance® is looking for four new national spokesmen and women to help put a human face on agriculture. Those selected will make public appearances, talk to the media and be featured in print ads on behalf of USFRA.  For the past 18 months, dairyman Will Gilmer of Alabama (R) has been one of the four national Faces of Farming and Ranching.
 
Eight finalists will be selected in September to participate in a public vote process and undergo a formal USFRA judging process. The winners will be announced October 24, in conjunction with Food Day. 
 
The four new Faces of Farming and Ranching will serve for a year. They will receive a $10,000 stipend to help cover costs at home while they are at USFRA events and a $5,000 donation to a charity of their choice. They also will receive professional media and speaker training.  
 
USFRA is an alliance of more than 80 agriculture organizations committed to engaging with consumers who have questions about how today’s food is grown and raised. 
 
Applications for the next round will be collected through mid-July. Those interested should contact NMPF Senior Vice President for Communications Chris Galen at cgalen@nmpf.org. In addition to filling out a form, applicants must submit a short video about their farm. 
 

NMPF & USDEC Members Insist that TPP Must Deliver Meaningful Access for All Dairy Products

Posted on by dcadmin
The majority of U.S. dairy farmer cooperatives and dairy processing companies, all of which are members of the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) or the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), today threatened to withdraw support from the pending Trans-Pacific trade agreement if Japan and Canada refuse to follow through on pledges to provide comprehensive market access for U.S. dairy products. Their letter can be found here.
NMPF and USDEC initiated this united dairy industry message intended to underscore the need for comprehensive market access in all dairy tariff lines with both nations in order to ensure that TPP negotiations result in a high standard trade agreement that can be held up as a model for future agreements.
“USDEC has been one of the most vocal champions of the importance of including Japan and Canada in TPP since these markets offer strong opportunities for our members to expand U.S. dairy exports,” stated Tom Suber, President of USDEC. “However, it is critical that their participation in TPP be meaningful and comprehensive across all dairy products. It is entirely unacceptable to have such sizable, sophisticated economies refusing to undertake the necessary openness that they agreed to upon entering TPP.”
Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of NMPF noted that, “As we have made clear in our letter to Ambassador Froman and Secretary Vilsack, we want to see very strong outcomes on market access with Japan and Canada, and our industry remains prepared to match the level of ambition of those countries. To be successful, any eventual TPP agreement must result in more open dairy markets in Japan and Canada.”
In addition to urging U.S. negotiators to remain focused on opening up the Japanese and Canadian dairy markets, members of both organizations also stressed the importance of addressing the lingering impacts of New Zealand government dairy policies that have intentionally advantaged a single national champion at the expense of other competitors.
NMPF and USDEC members expressed strong hopes that TPP negotiations will result in a final package that can garner the endorsement of the U.S. dairy industry without requiring a re-examination of the industry’s support for Trade Promotion Authority as a critical tool in the approval of well-negotiated trade agreements.
###
TEXT OF NMPF AND USDEC LETTER TO USDA AND USTR
June 3, 2014
Ambassador Michael Froman
United States Trade Representative
600 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20508
Secretary Thomas Vilsack
U.S. Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20250
Dear Ambassador Froman and Secretary Vilsack:
The undersigned dairy cooperatives and proprietary processors greatly appreciate the intensive efforts undertaken by Administration officials and you personally to obtain commitments from Japan and Canada on market access commensurate with the ambitious trade goals embraced by the charter members of the Trans‐Pacific Partnership (TPP).
It is clear, however, that Japan, as well as Canada, continues to strongly resist living up to the ambitious trade goals it obligated itself to undertake upon joining TPP negotiations. The U.S. dairy industry has been a leading and long‐standing advocate for comprehensive market access and the inclusion of Japan and Canada in TPP. Yet, we have held realistic expectations and recognize that the perfect should not be the enemy of the good. However, as reported in the media, Japan’s recent comments on market access progress show appallingly little substantive movement, and come nowhere close to our expectations. Canada will likely try to base its decisions on dairy market access off of what Japan commits to do for its most sensitive agricultural sectors, thus heightening the importance of achieving meaningful dairy market access to Japan.
We urge you to insist that TPP must remain a high standard trade agreement that can be used as a model for future U.S. free trade agreements. All TPP countries must do their part to ensure this undertaking lives up to its founding goals of comprehensive and meaningful market access. We are prepared to match the level of ambition of those countries, and urge you to press both to provide a very strong dairy package. Our industry must not provide any new access in this agreement that has not been given by Japan and Canada.
In addition, it is vital that TPP address serious non‐tariff policies by the New Zealand government that have uniquely advantaged the largest dairy exporting company in both the TPP region and the world. Tariffs are a critical component of this agreement, but not the only element.
It remains our hope that TPP negotiations with Japan and Canada can be concluded in a manner that will allow for strong support across our industry. However, our support for TPP is not unconditional. The elements cited here, which largely remain unresolved, must be concluded in a positive manner or our industry will find it difficult to support the final agreement. Similarly, our industry has been a strong supporter of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and would expect to continue to support it in the future. However, should Japan and Canada not commit to minimum standards and basic market‐based principles as many other TPP countries have done, we would need to re‐examine our support for TPA.
We stand ready to assist in delivering an agreement with market access provisions that we can support. Thank you, again, for the continuing efforts of you and your team.
Sincerely, 
Agri-Mark
Methuen, Massachusetts
Arthur Schuman Inc.
Fairfield, New Jersey
Associated Milk Producers Inc.
New Ulm, Minnesota
BelGioioso Cheese Inc.
Denmark, Wisconsin
Bongards’ Creameries
Norwood Young America, Minnesota
Cayuga Milk Ingredients
Auburn, New York
Commercial Creamery Co.
Spokane, Washington
Continental Dairy Products, Inc.
Artesia, New Mexico
Cooperative Milk Producers Association’s
Blackstone, Virginia
Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.
Kansas City, Missouri
Davisco Foods International, Inc.
Le Sueur, Minnesota
Ellsworth Cooperative Creamery
Ellsworth, Wisconsin
FarmFirst Dairy Cooperative
Madison, Wisconsin
First District Association
Litchfield, Minnesota
Foremost Farms
Baraboo, Wisconsin
Glanbia Foods, Inc.
Twin Falls, Idaho
Great Lakes Cheese Company
Hiram, Ohio
High Desert Milk
Burley, Idaho
Hilmar Cheese Company Inc.
Hilmar, California
HP Hood LLC
Winchester, Virginia
Idaho Milk Products
Jerome, Idaho
International Ingredient Corporation
St. Louis, Missouri
J.M. Smucker Company
Orrville, Ohio
Land O’Lakes
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Leprino Foods Company
Denver, Colorado
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative
Reston, Virginia
MCT Dairies, Inc.
Millburn, New Jersey
Michigan Milk Producers Association
Novi, Michigan
Mid-West Dairymen’s Co.
Rockford, Illinois
Northwest Dairy Association/Darigold
Seattle, Washington
Proliant Dairy Ingredients
Melrose, Minnesota
Sartori Company
Plymouth, Wisconsin
Schreiber Foods, Inc.
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Scott Brothers Dairy / Chino Valley Dairy Products
Chino, California
Select Milk Producers 
Artesia, New Mexico
St. Albans Cooperative Creamery, Inc.
St. Albans, Vermont
Swiss Valley Farms
Davenport, Iowa
United Dairymen of Arizona
Tempe, Arizona
Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc.
Buffalo, New York

 

NMPF Asks EPA to Allow More Time to Consider Science Behind Regulation of Waters of the U.S.

Posted on by dcadmin
 
The National Milk Producers Federation today urged the Environmental Protection Agency to allow more time to examine a controversial draft regulation expanding the waterways subject to regulation under the federal Clean Water Act. 
 
“It is imperative that the EPA go about this effort in the right way, in light of the potential impact of this measure on dairy farmers,” NMPF’s President and CEO, Jim Mulhern, wrote in a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and Jo-Ellen Darcy, the Assistant Secretary of the Army. “It would be a disservice to farmers to rush this proposal through the review process without sufficient scientific support or time to better understand the complexities of the issue.”
 
NMPF, which represents dairy farmers producing most of the nation’s milk supply, asked that the public comment period on the draft regulation be extended at least 90 days. 
 
Unveiled in March, the draft regulation expands the waterways covered under the 1972 Clean Water Act to nearly all those connected to U.S. navigable waters. Opponents, many of whom have urged EPA to withdraw the regulation, argue it would have a devastating impact, particularly on agriculture. 
 
NMPF cited two reasons for requesting more time to consider the regulation:  First, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have not completed the report providing the scientific underpinning for the regulation; and second, many of the key concepts discussed in the draft are unclear or subject to interpretation by government regulators. 
 
“In order for dairy farmers to understand, assess and adequately comment on the proposed changes, the science behind the WOTUS proposal must be clear and conclusive,” NMPF wrote.  But the proposal relies on the scientific conclusions of a draft EPA report still under review by the agency’s Science Advisory Board (SAB).
 
Where the matter of key concepts is concerned, the proposal uses terms such as “neighboring,’’ ‘‘riparian area,’’ ‘‘floodplain,’’ ‘‘tributary,’’ and ‘‘significant nexus.”
 
“These terms are as clear as muddy water, and, therefore, will create confusion for dairy producers,” Mulhern said.  Additionally, the proposed rule heavily relies on “best professional judgment” in application of these and other terms, potentially creating a great deal of uncertainty both for regulators and those regulated.
 
“Dairy farmers are committed to protecting U.S. waters both voluntarily and under the Clean Water Act,” said Mulhern in the letter sent Friday. 
 
“Given the scope and complexities of the proposed rule and its supporting documents, NMPF requests an extension of the comment period, either to 90 days beyond the current deadline, or 90 days beyond EPA’s release of the final connectivity report” providing scientific basis for the regulation, the organization said.
 
###
 
The National Milk Producers Federation, based in Arlington, VA, develops and carries out policies that advance the well-being of dairy producers and the cooperatives they own. The members of NMPF’s cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S. milk supply, making NMPF the voice of more than 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. Visit www.nmpf.org for more information.
 
Posted in Uncategorized

New Dairy Safety Net Woven with Key Principles

Posted on by dcadmin
In the aftermath of the economic bloodbath created by the Great Recession of 2008-2009, a period during which dairy farmers collectively lost $20 billion in equity, it became painfully obvious that a complete reform of farm policy was needed.  The National Milk Producers Federation spent the next two years developing an innovative means of protecting farmers against low milk prices and, just as importantly, high feed costs – because rapidly rising feed costs had become the more urgent issue in the past decade.
After years of struggle on Capitol Hill to get a new dairy program enacted by Congress, what has emerged from this challenging process is an unprecedented opportunity for dairy producers to work with the federal government to gain protection from the unpredictable, catastrophic price shocks that unfortunately have become common in recent years.  While important questions about the new Margin Protection Program (MPP) still need to be answered by the Agriculture Department, it’s already clear that this new safety net will provide much improved economic security for the domestic dairy sector in the 21st century.  Here are some reasons why:
Flexibility: Farmers can choose their own level of margin protection each year.  The USDA is expected to create an open enrollment window in the preceding year, during which farmers can decide their coverage options for the following year. Each year, a producer’s historic base can be insured from 25% to 90%, from the premium-free $4/cwt. coverage level, up to $8/cwt.  NMPF has suggested to USDA ways that the program can be made farmer-friendly, while at the same time helping keep costs of the MPP at reasonable levels.
Affordability: NMPF worked with Congress to ensure that the MPP’s premium levels are affordable to farms of all sizes, including those that may not have previous experience with private-sector risk management tools.  Beyond the nominal annual sign-up fee of $100, basic coverage at $4/cwt. is free, at all levels of milk production.  Prices for coverage rise in proportion to the degree of risk covered. But, particularly for the first four million pounds of coverage, a valuable safety net can be obtained for mere pennies per hundredweight each year. And risk coverage on production over four million pounds is very reasonable at lower and mid-levels of margin protection.
Equitability: The MILC program formally ends on Sept. 1st.  The practical value of this program eroded over the past decade, as its annual coverage cap is now exceeded by the average-size dairy, which produces closer to four million pounds annually.  With the majority of our milk supply coming from farms not adequately covered by the MILC program, the new MPP provides better protection because it has no insurance coverage limitations.  This is a far more equitable way to protect our milk production – and dairy farm – infrastructure than the previous size-denominated efforts. We need modern risk management going forward, not a program designed for the past.
Adaptability: One of the arguments against the previous safety net employed by USDA is that the dairy product price support program – even at a ridiculously inadequate price level around $10/cwt. – made it harder for domestic markets to clear during periods of oversupply, and at the same time, harder for the U.S. to compete internationally.  It was easier to sell surplus cheese, butter and skim milk powder to the government than to commercial markets.  That problem was solved by terminating the price support program.  The USDA is no longer a customer for surplus dairy commodity production, at any price. This means processors will adjust their product mix to what domestic and international customers want, not what USDA CCC purchasing standards dictate.  The MPP will help the industry further adapt to the ebb and flow of global markets.
These four principles were the ones NMPF pursued in its efforts to create a new dairy program.  Enshrining these principles in the new MPP is a tribute to the work of dairy farmers who, despite significant opposition, persevered in pushing for something new and better. Yes, this program is not the whole loaf that we sought. But it will be far, far better than what it replaces.
USDA still has important decisions to make, from the timing of first-year enrollment, to the schedule of premiums to be paid by enrollees, to how farms with different ownership structures will be treated. It also has to flesh out how the complementary dairy product donation program will operate if and when margins become extremely low. Those issues will be resolved in the coming months.
But the bottom line is this is a once-in-a-generation revolution in risk management in America’s dairy sector, allowing our 50,000 farmers the opportunity to preserve equity in a way that their fathers and grandfathers never could.  Those who enroll will have skin in the game in the form of their premium payments, so this is not a government handout.  Most of all, the new MPP is an illustration that cooperation and hard work have their rewards.

177 House Members Urge the Obama Administration to Remove EU Trade Barriers Hampering U.S. Dairy Industry

Posted on by dcadmin
A bipartisan group of 177 members of the U.S. House of Representatives today urged the Obama administration to use the transatlantic trade talks with the European Union (EU) to address a variety of export barriers hampering the U.S. dairy industry. Among the barriers are the EU’s recent efforts to prevent U.S. companies from using common food names like parmesan and feta in export markets, including the EU, and even in the U.S. domestic market. 
 
The Congressional Dairy Farmer Caucus co-chairs, led by Reps. Reid Ribble and Peter Welch, spearheaded the letter to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. In that message House members said negotiations with the European Union over the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) offer a good opportunity to address protectionist measures that block U.S. dairy sales to 500 million consumers. “We urge you to achieve a strong and beneficial outcome for the U.S. dairy industry in these trade negotiations,” the letter said.  

 
The House members noted that EU dairy tariffs, which average roughly three times the level of U.S. dairy tariffs, have contributed to the $1.3 billion trade deficit for U.S. dairy products. “While the EU enjoys a country-specific tariff rate quota for dairy access into the U.S. market, the U.S. has no such similar preferential access to EU countries,” they said. “Furthermore, while U.S. certification requirements for the vast majority of EU dairy products are relatively nominal, EU certificate requirements for dairy products are more extensive, impeding U.S. access into the EU market.” EU non-tariff barriers are a major impediment for U.S. imports.
 
Also in the letter, House members singled out EU efforts to restrict the use of many common food names – including a number of cheese names used in this country for decades, such as parmesan and potentially havarti – under the guise of geographical indication regulations. “The EU is taking a mechanism that was created to protect consumers against misleading information and instead using it to carve out exclusive market access for its own producers,” they said. “This type of barrier to trade and commerce defies the fundamental goals of a trade agreement, and we urge you to work aggressively against the EU’s efforts ….”
 
With the exception of the EU market, U.S. dairy exports have risen dramatically across the globe in recent years, reaching $6.7 billion in 2013 and accounting for more than 15 percent of domestic milk production. The congressional letter noted that foreign markets now account for one day of milking every week. “This dynamic helps support good American jobs in rural areas all across the country,” the letter said. 
 
The Congressional Dairy Farmer Caucus has been an active and leading voice on dairy trade issues. The other co-chairs joining Reps. Ribble and Welch on the letter include Bruce Braley, Joe Courtney, Tom Petri, David Valadao, and Tim Walz. 
 
 
#  #  #  #  #
The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), based in Arlington, Va., develops and carries out policies that advance the well-being of U.S. dairy producers and the cooperatives they collectively own. The members of NMPF’s cooperatives produce the majority of the U.S, milk supply, making NMPF the voice of nearly 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill and with government agencies. For more on NMPF’s activities, visit www.nmpf.org.
 
The U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) is a non-profit, independent membership organization that represents the global trade interests of U.S. dairy producers, proprietary processors and cooperatives, ingredient suppliers and export traders. Its mission is to enhance U.S. global competitiveness and assist the U.S. industry to increase its global dairy ingredient sales and exports of U.S. dairy products. 
 
The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), Washington, D.C., represents the nation’s dairy manufacturing and marketing industries and their suppliers, with a membership of 550 companies within a $125-billion a year industry. IDFA’s dairy processing members provide more than 85 percent of the milk, cultured products, cheese, ice cream and frozen desserts produced and marketed in the United States. Visit IDFA at www.idfa.org.  
 
 
Posted in Uncategorized

NMPF Sends USDA Recommendations on New Safety Net Program

Posted on by dcadmin
NMPF has sent a series of recommendations to the Agriculture Department on how to implement the new dairy safety net included the 2014 farm bill. The Margin Protection Program, or MPP, is a voluntary risk management plan that will address fluctuations in margins caused by high feed costs as well as low milk prices. NMPF was instrumental in the program’s enactment.  
 
NMPF’s recommendations, forwarded in mid-April, cover 17 issues that are either unclear in the legislation or were left up to USDA to decide. Included are the timing for first-year and subsequent registrations; the timing and structure of premium payments from farmers enrolled in the program; and how farms with different ownership structures will be treated. Several recommendations involve the operation of the dairy product donation program that will be triggered when margins are extremely low. 
 
NMPF President and CEO Jim Mulhern said he is pleased with discussions with the Agriculture Department over the new program so far. “While USDA has not yet made final determinations on any specific program provisions,” he said, “we are pleased with the positive dialogue and level of understanding we’ve seen.” 
 
Mulhern said NMPF’s goal is to achieve a Margin Protection Program that is both producer-friendly and maintains fiscal integrity in future years.  The program is scheduled to be rolled out on or before September 1st.
 

NMPF, IDFA Jointly Oppose Louisiana Raw Milk Bill

Posted on by dcadmin
Dairy producers and processors joined forces to oppose another state-level raw milk bill in April, urging Louisiana lawmakers to reject HB 247 two days before it was scheduled for a hearing. The bill would lift the state’s ban on selling unpasteurized milk to consumers. 
 
In a joint letter, NMPF and IDFA cited the government statistics on illnesses and deaths from raw milk consumption and noted that raw milk is a vehicle for transmitting pathogens including E. coli 0157:H7, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella.
 
The groups also debunked advocates’ claims that consuming raw milk has health benefits and that testing and regulation can protect consumers. “No claim related to the health benefits of consuming raw milk has been substantiated in any of the medical literature,” they said, adding that “product testing … cannot ensure the same level of safety as pasteurization.” 
 
More than three dozen raw milk bills have been introduced in state legislatures this year, but as of April, only one had passed, despite intense lobbying by a small group of advocates. The successful bill authorized a study of liability issues related to raw milk sales between Utah farmers and consumers. In January, NMPF Vice President Beth Briczinski testified against a raw milk bill in Maryland that was subsequently withdrawn. 
 

FDA Agrees to Rewrite Draft Animal Feed Regulation after NMPF Raises Concerns

Posted on by dcadmin
NMPF joined other farm groups in blasting a draft Food and Drug Administration livestock feed regulation, saying the agency went beyond Congress’ intent and proposed requirements that will not make animal feed safer. NMPF asked FDA to rewrite the regulation and open a new round of comments from industry and the public. 
 
Among other things, NMPF said the draft incorrectly imposes safety standards on animal feed that are similar to those for human food. “The innate hygienic standards of humans exceed the hygienic standards of livestock,” NMPF said.
 
The draft regulation was issued under the Food Safety Modernization Act, which gave the FDA broad new authority to regulate food. NMPF said it supports the 2010 law, but believes that the draft regulation goes too far, in particular because it would make it harder to use brewers’ grain as animal feed, a practice in use for hundreds of years.
 
This “will result in unnecessary increased costs to dairy producers,” NMPF said. It joined the Beer Institute and the American Malting Barley Association in asking FDA to exempt feed products made during alcoholic beverage production from the regulation.  Late last month, FDA officials indicated they will change the proposed regulation of brewers’ and distillers’ grains in light of the opposition of NMPF and other organizations.
 
In separate comments submitted with the International Dairy Foods Association, NMPF identified unnecessary requirements for dairy processing plants, which divert some food materials such as cheese trim and liquid whey to animal feed. NMPF said the proposed standards “do not reflect the inherent differences between foods for human and animal consumption.”